The All-Big 12 lists that rank all the conference stars as 1st team, 2nd team and so on is predominantly based on preseason expectations. If a player is expected to be great, or is a senior, his place on the lists will reflect that. Coaches will make sure to soothe each other’s political desires and reward seniors, program kids and pretend like the preseason expectations were matched by the performance on the field.
Of course there is an exception to that standard; Texas is routinely robbed in the All-conference teams. In the instance of the newly released 2009 All Big 12 teams, Texas has 3 first team players. OU managed to get 4 players selected to this list and that offensive juggernaut Kansas St. placed 4 players, all on offense.
Before I look over other injustices how about we just look at the list?
1ST Team defense:
DE: Von Miller, A&M: this one is obvious. He leads the nation in sacks.
DE: Brandon Sharpe; TT: another big achiever in the pass rush, fair choice.
DE: Jared Crick Nebraska: at this point it’s clear that they chose the ends with the 3 highest sack totals. Also, it’s unclear how this defense will perform with 3 quick-ends and 5 total defensive lineman. This will be a reoccurring theme.
DT: Ndamukong Suh: He is really good.
DT: Gerald McCoy: the tricky thing is, you can’t really point to any stats that would suggest either McCoy or Suh have been more dominant than Texas’ Lamarr Houston. They are ahead of him here because they were ahead in the preseason.
LB: Sean Witherspoon, Missouri: a lot of all-around hype for this guy.
LB: Jessie Smith Iowa St.: we can’t offend Iowa St. by not including one of their fine athletes somewhere right? Might as well do it at the expense of a Longhorn like Roddrick Muckelroy who has terrorized the league for 2 years at a level beyond anything Smith could dream of.
LB: Travis Lewis, OU There is nothing in the numbers that suggests that Lewis is better than Muckelroy either.
Here the list just names DBs but I’m going to list their exact position to further demonstrate the absurdity:
Corner: Perrish Cox, OSU: He’s a standout to be sure. Aaron Williams is a better player who was injured too often. I might take Curtis Brown here as well.
Corner: Dominique Franks, OU: Another worthy enough pick. The trend here, however, tends to reward the Sooner Defense over the even more dominant Texas one.
Coner: Prince Amakamara, Nebraska: This is our 3rd corner I notice. I suppose that actually makes sense in this league but it should be at the expense of a defensive end AND a linebacker.
Safety: Larry Asante, Nebraska: Anytime a safety makes 2 interceptions and breaks up 7 passes in a pass-heavy league you adorn him with praise.
Safety: Earl Thomas, Texas: Arguably the best player in the league, somehow not a unanimous 1st team selection.
1st Team Offense:
QB: Colt McCoy: they managed to avoid blowing this, surprisingly.
RB: Daniel Thomas, Kansas St.: The Kansas St. running game gets a lot of attention in this list. I think everyone is afraid of Coach Snyder.
RB: Keith Toston, OSU: He’s really not that great of a runner. He benefitted from getting the majority of the carries in the Oklahoma St. running system.
FB: Bryant Ward: OSU: it’s required to pick a fullback to honor so they simply choose the one on the best running team. I think OU might actually have an argument here but who cares about this position anyways.
TE: Jeron Mastrud, Kansas St. Mastrud terrorized defenses to the tune of 21 catches for 233 yards and a devastating Touchdown. When not horrifying defenses with the threat of a 3 yard release pattern, he plowed ahead for Daniel Thomas en route to 1200 yards over the worst competition college football has to offer. He’s a no brainer here.
WR: Jordan Shipley, Tx: duh. Thank you.
WR: Danario Alexander, Missouri: Pretty explosive player, 1600 yards on the year.
WR: Dezmon Briscoe, Kansas: Solid overall list at WR. You could make a case for OU’s Ryan Broyles but I sure won’t. It’s not hard to pick 3 dominant WR in this league.
Now the OL:
LT: Nick Stringer, Kansas St: Had as much to do with Thomas’ amazing success running the ball as just about anyone else on the line.
LT: Trent Williams, OU: Was not completely embarrassed by the Texas pass-rush.
LT: Russel Okung, OSU: Best LT in the conference, possible top 10 draft pick.
LT: Nate Solder, Colorado: I have trouble seeing the logic here given Colorado’s terrible pass protection.
RG: Brandon Carter, Texas Tech: Great run blocker, good pass-protector for an interior lineman. I hope he knows how to snap the ball…
KR/PR: Brandon Banks, Kansas st: He’s an awesome kick returner, with 4 TDs. Not so great a punt returner. Shipley should go here if they didn’t want to avoid rewarding the same guy twice.
At this point all I can do is attempt to form my own list. I don’t have the benefit of having seen all these teams play very much, only my own few perceptions and the use of stats which alone may ascend my list above this crappy one.
Additionally, I’m going to create a real Big 12 offense and defense. And it will be schematically coherent.
Ian’s All Big 12 Offense:
QB: Colt McCoy, Texas: I’m choosing Colt because he’s the best quarterback in the country. He can run well enough to operate some option-read and he’s the best short-intermediate passer Texas has ever had.
RB: Daniel Thomas, Kansas st: As much as I’ve mocked Kansas St. he was the most accomplished runner this year and is used to the shotgun formations this offense would run. I would rather choose a back with explosiveness in the receiving game but Batch from Tech and Murray from OU put up inconsistent seasons.
FB: There is no fullback.
TE: Riar Greer, Colorado: No one really utilized a Tight end very well in this conference but Greer is one of the better receiving threats and a solid check down for McCoy.
Sub B receiver: Jordan Shipley, Texas: He’s going in the slot where he can punish everyone.
Flanker, Dezmon Briscoe, Kansas: Another phenomenal midfield weapon.
Split End: Danario Alexander, Missouri: I would love to just put Malcolm Wiliams here and moved Alexander to flanker and could have justified it had Williams not had to split time with John Chiles. Alexander with his 6-5 frame will go very nicely here though.
LT: Adam Ulatoski, Texas: He was entrusted with handling Von Miller alone against A&M. He’s not as good as Okung, but I like Ulatoski here with potential help from Greer and Okung plowing the road on the right.
LG: Andrew Lewis, Oklahoma St: Part of the Oklahoma St. machine who is mobile enough in the zone-blocking game and good in pass protection.
C: JD Walton, Baylor: Best center in the conference that I’m aware of.
RG: Brandon Carter, Texas Tech: He’s adept at pass-protection, which is what this offense will be all about, and a punishing run-blocker.
RT: Russel Okung, Oklahoma St.: As great a Left tackle as he is, his value in the run game makes him a better fit here.
Here we have a coherent Offense that utilizes the conference’s best talent and features a line that can handle zone-blocking and the pass-protection necessary to keep McCoy upright.
Ian’s All-Big 12 defense
This defense will be designed to handle the typical Big 12 offenses and have a 4-2-5 under alignment.
End/Linebacker: Von Miller, Texas A&M: He’s lightning quick and has 17 sacks on the year. If left single-blocked he will wreck opposing passing games.
Nose-Tackle: Ndamukong Suh. He can provide a great interior pass-rush with 6.5 sacks and the ability to handle the double teams that come here. Another perk, when the double team keeps him off the QB (besides freeing up Miller) is his 10 pass break-ups at the line.
3-tech/quick tackle: Lamarr Houston, Texas: I will justify Houston over McCoy with the following numbers. Houston had more tackles, 50-31, more sacks 7-5, more quarterback hurries, 26-9, and more tackles for loss 20-14.5. Houston is a more disruptive option and lived in the opponents backfield.
Power-end: Sergio Kindle, Texas. Sergio split time as the linebacker on this side and as a defensive end at Miller’s position. His sack numbers were down on the year but his season was phenomenal. 28 quarterback hurries, 17 tackles for loss and 56 tackles overall make him the best option at this spot.
We are only taking 2 linebackers here, a Middle Linebacker and a Weakside linebacker. MLB needs to be able to handle the inside running game and intermediate coverage responsibilities. Weakside LB needs to be a fast, tackling machine who can strip the ball.
Middle Linebacker: Joe Pawelek, Baylor: Interceptions were down from last year to only one and his 4 tackles for loss weren’t stunning but overall this is one of the most well rounded players in the conference and his 109 tackles overall speak to his ability to find the football.
Weakside Linebacker, Roddrick Muckelroy, Texas: It’s time Muck got his due. I like Emmanuel Acho for the future because of his ball-stripping abilities but Muck’s 10 tackles for loss, 2 sacks and 87 total tackles demonstrate how much of a speed demon he is for the Texas defense. Additionally, he did this from middle linebacker after Jared Norton was injured.
Corner: Perrish Cox, Oklahoma State: He had 4 interceptions on the season along with 15 pass break-ups.
Corner: Curtis Brown, Texas: Only 1 interception on the season for Curtis but it was one that few could make. His 14 pass break-ups are a good indicator of his athletic ability and its usefulness in finding the ball at its highest point in coverage. His 50 tackles and forced fumble also demonstrate his physical play.
Nickel: Prince Amukamara, Nebraska: He’s solid as a physical option inside against the run with 50 tackles, 3 tackles for loss, 2 sacks and 1 forced fumble on the year. Against the dangerous slot receivers in the Big 12 he should be fine having picked off 3 passes this year and broken up 10 more. Aaron Williams might be more talented but Amukamara’s production earns him this spot.
Strong Safety: Earl Thomas, Texas: He’s going to hang near the line in Cover-1 robber at times where he can pattern read and jump routes. With 8 interceptions on the year he is a weapon to disrupt any and all passing routes made by the opposing team.
Free Safety: Quinton Carter, Oklahoma: Carter is a Cover-2 safety who can crash down on plays in front of him with speed. On my defense he’ll be way back as a free safety where his 3 interceptions and 5 pass break-ups suggest he is a more than adequate centerfield playing behind Amukamara, Brown, Cox and Thomas. He had 80 tackles on the year and 2.5 for loss so he has the ability to attack plays closer to the line as necessary.
All that said, clearly I believe that Texas has the best defense in the Big 12 and should have been rewarded as such in the all-conference teams.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Monday, November 16, 2009
Fourth and 2? how the Patriots really lost
It seems often that the NFL is a place where common sense is most easily applied in a manner that contradicts the opinion of punditry or coaching. Last night I watched the Patriots blow a 13 point lead in the 4rth quarter to Manning in the Colts and could scarcely believe what I had witnessed.
Some overall impressions I had of the game were that,
A). The Patriots O-line is still one of the best in the NFL. They get out on screen passes and make blocks downfield until the whistle stops. Kazcur had big problems with Mathis but the backup LT Vullmer was able to handle Dwight Freeney one-on-one and that’s a huge accomplishment. The Colt’s pass rush was really quite inadequate for dealing with the Pats pass-offense.
B). The only real running game for the Pats is the draw game. When they want to line up and just run the ball they are less effective. Running the ball is a major threat from the Patriots in instances and formations where the short pass to welker, or the deep pass to Moss are also likely.
C). What Manning is doing with these corp of receivers is very impressive. To me it is reminiscent of the Patriots offense pre-Moss although Manning still has Reggie Wayne.
D). Both teams lack lock-down corners and were dependent on 2 deep safeties to reliably contain Moss and Reggie Wayne from simply torching them. As it was, both receivers were still devastating.
Ultimately I thought the Patriots clock management and offensive playcalls in the 4rth quarter were poor and the reason for their shocking defeat. The Pats ran the ball, in a few short drives, 6 times for a total of 3 yards. No run went for more than 2 yards. To successfully run out the clock while holding a lead a team needs to actually sustain a drive.
It is a frustrating misconception, that you must run the ball while ahead, to win. Running out the clock is extremely valuable and running plays are the easiest way to do that. However, sustained drives regardless of whether they result in points are most important. What’s better? Driving 60 yards and kick a field goal while passing and stopping the clock some or to drive 20 yards with an ineffectual running game before punting? Which is more likely to burn clock? Which would have helped the Patriots more?
Ultimately you would prefer to be able to line up in the I-formation and run the ball effectively in the 4rth quarter on a drained defense. But if you can’t do so, and you’re facing Peyton Manning, it’s much smarter to keep your foot on the throat and keep scoring. It’s more risky to punt often and not score than to keep pushing the pace and piling up points while risking stopping the clock or turnovers.
In addition to playing too conservative on offense in the 4rth quarter, the Patriots managed to squander all their timeouts in the 2nd half well before the 2 minute mark. The opportunity to challenge the 4rth and 2 spot by the officials should have been automatic. It was a very close call, I personally think that it was a first down. If the Patriots had challenged it perhaps it’s most likely that there would have been insufficient evidence to overturn the spot and award a first down but the Patriots should have at least given themselves the chance to make a challenge.
What’s been most frustrating to me from this game, in addition to having watched the Patriots lose a game late in the 4rth quarter to an undefeated rival, has been hearing the analysis across the country condemning Belichek for his decision to go for it on 4rth down. Smartfootball.com did some quick math that concluded that the odds dictate a 4rth down attempt because the probability of conversion is high and the odds of stopping Manning weren’t great. He had 2 timeouts, 2 minutes and an exhausted defense to work against which he had been steadily picking apart throughout the quarter.
The odds of winning include the odds of converting the 4rth down in addition to the odds of preventing a touchdown from the 30 yard line. Together those make a compelling case. The opposite is the odds of stopping Manning and the punt return from scoring a TD in 2 minutes with 2 timeouts.
Is it a gutsy call? Only in the sense that failure draws greater criticism, mathematically the real risk was to punt the ball. Colin Cowherd, sometimes buffoon, argued today on the radio that it was somehow less respectful of Manning’s prowess to go for it on 4rth down? Really? The option that goes to greater lengths to prevent Manning from touching the ball is riskier?
Certainly the game came down to the 4rth quarter drive, however the circumstances that lead to that play had a much greater impact on the outcome of the game. The Patriots inability to run the ball in traditional sets in obvious running situations mixed with a failure to adjust playcalling to address that shortcoming allowed the Colts opportunities to get back in the game.
The 4rth quarter call is only criticized because it failed, much like the USC call on 4rth and 2 vs. Vince Young that would have been the Trojan’s best chance at stopping number 10 from taking the crystal ball.
Some overall impressions I had of the game were that,
A). The Patriots O-line is still one of the best in the NFL. They get out on screen passes and make blocks downfield until the whistle stops. Kazcur had big problems with Mathis but the backup LT Vullmer was able to handle Dwight Freeney one-on-one and that’s a huge accomplishment. The Colt’s pass rush was really quite inadequate for dealing with the Pats pass-offense.
B). The only real running game for the Pats is the draw game. When they want to line up and just run the ball they are less effective. Running the ball is a major threat from the Patriots in instances and formations where the short pass to welker, or the deep pass to Moss are also likely.
C). What Manning is doing with these corp of receivers is very impressive. To me it is reminiscent of the Patriots offense pre-Moss although Manning still has Reggie Wayne.
D). Both teams lack lock-down corners and were dependent on 2 deep safeties to reliably contain Moss and Reggie Wayne from simply torching them. As it was, both receivers were still devastating.
Ultimately I thought the Patriots clock management and offensive playcalls in the 4rth quarter were poor and the reason for their shocking defeat. The Pats ran the ball, in a few short drives, 6 times for a total of 3 yards. No run went for more than 2 yards. To successfully run out the clock while holding a lead a team needs to actually sustain a drive.
It is a frustrating misconception, that you must run the ball while ahead, to win. Running out the clock is extremely valuable and running plays are the easiest way to do that. However, sustained drives regardless of whether they result in points are most important. What’s better? Driving 60 yards and kick a field goal while passing and stopping the clock some or to drive 20 yards with an ineffectual running game before punting? Which is more likely to burn clock? Which would have helped the Patriots more?
Ultimately you would prefer to be able to line up in the I-formation and run the ball effectively in the 4rth quarter on a drained defense. But if you can’t do so, and you’re facing Peyton Manning, it’s much smarter to keep your foot on the throat and keep scoring. It’s more risky to punt often and not score than to keep pushing the pace and piling up points while risking stopping the clock or turnovers.
In addition to playing too conservative on offense in the 4rth quarter, the Patriots managed to squander all their timeouts in the 2nd half well before the 2 minute mark. The opportunity to challenge the 4rth and 2 spot by the officials should have been automatic. It was a very close call, I personally think that it was a first down. If the Patriots had challenged it perhaps it’s most likely that there would have been insufficient evidence to overturn the spot and award a first down but the Patriots should have at least given themselves the chance to make a challenge.
What’s been most frustrating to me from this game, in addition to having watched the Patriots lose a game late in the 4rth quarter to an undefeated rival, has been hearing the analysis across the country condemning Belichek for his decision to go for it on 4rth down. Smartfootball.com did some quick math that concluded that the odds dictate a 4rth down attempt because the probability of conversion is high and the odds of stopping Manning weren’t great. He had 2 timeouts, 2 minutes and an exhausted defense to work against which he had been steadily picking apart throughout the quarter.
The odds of winning include the odds of converting the 4rth down in addition to the odds of preventing a touchdown from the 30 yard line. Together those make a compelling case. The opposite is the odds of stopping Manning and the punt return from scoring a TD in 2 minutes with 2 timeouts.
Is it a gutsy call? Only in the sense that failure draws greater criticism, mathematically the real risk was to punt the ball. Colin Cowherd, sometimes buffoon, argued today on the radio that it was somehow less respectful of Manning’s prowess to go for it on 4rth down? Really? The option that goes to greater lengths to prevent Manning from touching the ball is riskier?
Certainly the game came down to the 4rth quarter drive, however the circumstances that lead to that play had a much greater impact on the outcome of the game. The Patriots inability to run the ball in traditional sets in obvious running situations mixed with a failure to adjust playcalling to address that shortcoming allowed the Colts opportunities to get back in the game.
The 4rth quarter call is only criticized because it failed, much like the USC call on 4rth and 2 vs. Vince Young that would have been the Trojan’s best chance at stopping number 10 from taking the crystal ball.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
How Texas can win: Scoring points
Sadly teams have found a smarter way to defend Colt and the Texas offense this season. Texas A&M figured it out in 2006 when they intercepted barely-healthy McCoy 3 times before knocking him out of the game. It took 2 years until last year’s Tech game for the rest of the nation to catch on. Basically, the standard defense Texas faces now looks like this:
The linebackers are often 5 yards off the line of scrimmage and the corners play very soft on the outside receivers. They keep the Texas receivers in front of them and force Colt to complete dink and dunk passes for 70 yard drives in order to score and wait for the inevitable failed running play or incomplete pass to kill the drive. If the offense is particularly predictable the defense has time to react…good thing that’s not an issue with Texas…
Normally, you would simply run against a 6 man front with the linebackers playing so far off the ball and be very satisfied to move the ball 5-6 yards at a time and see if you can catch a few big plays from play-action if the defense gets tired of watching you execute short passes and running plays. Texas tried this very strategy against Colorado, running the ball and attempting to work the play-action game. Unfortunately, this same prevent-style defense sets up linebackers very well against the Texas running game.
All the outside-zone runs, counters and traps that Texas ran against Colorado are slow-developing and very easy to pick up on. With a few play-action exceptions, if you see a Texas guard moving in a direction, you can count on the ball going there as well. With the linebackers sitting further back, the Texas linemen have a longer way to go to reach them on blocks. If the opponents are at all familiar with our simple running game it’s not hard to fly downhill and blow up the attempted run.
Will Oklahoma employ this strategy of playing off Texas? It’s hard to say because Stoops and Venables have so much pride that forces them to play 3 linebackers in virtually all scenarios still while also attempting to defend the entire field. However, besides tighter coverage on the outside receivers you can probably count on OU playing a little zone and aggressively coming down on our plays as soon as they read them out just like every year.
I hope this paints a fairly bleak picture of Texas’ offensive chances against OU because on the surface that’s exactly what it is. A struggling offense vs. a defense primed to take advantage.
In the big scheme of things, OU’s defense was schematically ahead of Texas’ offense until 2005 when Vince could pass or throw and no defense stood a chance. After overcoming the hump of actually scoring more than 20 points against Stoops, Greg Davis finally figured out how to attack him. In 2007 Texas played one of it’s finest offensive games under Mack Brown in the series and lost as a result of dumb 4rth quarter defense and 2 costly turnovers (one of which cost a touchdown and momentum).
In that game Jermichael Finley had 4 receptions for 149 yards and a touchdown. Young Blaine Irby also had a 26 yard catch. Boom, suddenly Greg Davis knew what to do. Before the 2008 game Blaine Irby blew out his knee and Davis inserted Shipley into the new Flex tight end position in a 4-Wide Receiver offense and this resulted in 11 catches for 112 yards and a touchdown.
Mack Brown pointed out this week that Davis gets criticized for the running game while avoiding praise for his brilliant passing game. True enough, he doesn’t get a lot of credit for an excellent college passing game, although you would like to see more than 50% comprehension of the various possibilities presented by offensive football. In 2007 he unveiled a good counter and running back draw for Jamaal Charles that resulted in 79 yards on 17 carries before a costly Charles fumble moved Davis to abandon the running game and any chance of winning.
Furthermore, we never really saw the running back draw again, despite it being the obvious staple of a pass-first offense such as Texas employs. Last year Texas found success in the running game by virtue of the OU defense simply wearing down to the point of being unable to fight off pulling guards and catch Chris Ogbonnaya. That was surprising then but not totally unlikely for this year.
This particular incarnation of OU’s defense was expected to be the greatest since perhaps the 2000 championship unit. Fortunately, I can say with confidence that it is definitively not. We’ll go over matchups later but overall the team has the same basic strengths and weakness as it does every year. They are vulnerable to misdirection, because of their aggression, and passes against the middle of the field.
This year Texas has one of its best weapons to date for attacking the middle in Dan Buckner. As excellent a receiver as Jordan Shipley is, perhaps the best to ever even play at Texas, playing flex tight end is not maximizing his potential. Dan Buckner has more of the size and strength to play over the middle and be a large target for Colt to find.
Given a decent amount of time in the pocket there should be plenty of options for Colt to hit. OU’s defensive line is strong and Jeremy Beals is an excellent pass-rusher but Venables typically insists on calling zone blitzes that Colt will read and exploit when they choose to use them. The real question is whether or not Texas can run the ball sufficiently to win.
There are a few reasons why I am optimistic that Texas will find a way to do so. Vondrell McGee and Tre Newton are both injured and there is consequently no temptation for Texas to try and employ them against the OU defense. This might be a good thing given their skill sets and what Texas needs in this game. Additionally, the mythical Fozzy beast is rumored to be 100 percent for this game and is listed as co-starter with Cody Johnson. Fozzy has the skill set Texas should be looking for.
Miami found a way to run the ball on OU to the tune of 150 yards on 15 carries for Javarris James. My extensive film study (watching the game on DVR while drifting in and out of consciousness) revealed that OU’s front 7 is not actually as strong as was suspected in the preseason.
Ryan Reynolds is a perfect example of the typical weakness of an OU defense. When he correctly diagnoses the play, he flies downhill to the ball and blows things up. If you ask him to move laterally, confuse him and lure him into taking false steps, or ask him to cover a mobile receiver over the middle you set him up for failure. He has 2 surgically repaired knees and blew one of them in last year’s game.
Gerald McCoy, for all the talk, was taken out of the game against Miami by consistent double teams and the rest of that front 7 didn’t exploit the resulting freedom with any resounding success.
So, how can Texas run the ball successfully against OU? Why does it matter that Fozzy Bear will be getting the first chance to make something happen?
There are a few ways that I think are remotely likely to occur that might result in running game success that would put this game away. I’ve listed them in order of likelihood.
1). Exhaustion by the OU defense: Given a likely no-huddle pace combined with little chance for success by the OU offense this is the best bet.
2). Cutbacks by Fozzy: The best run against Colorado was the late touchdown run when, after the play was blown up again, Fozzy just reversed field and ran around the defense. While that might be a bit much to expect a few cutback runs could take Ryan Reynolds out of the picture and possibly result in some big runs.
3). The no-huddle under-center game: Texas runs the ball best from the no-huddle when teams get tired and linebackers are backpedaling against the pass. Against ULM Texas ran an excellent under-center no-huddle series and then mostly shelved it up until now. Breaking out the inside-zone (based on cutback runs) and then using play-action could get some big plays on the OU defense.
4). Wild Chiles: The Wild Horn formation, which I insist should be commonly known as “the wild Chiles” has many elements of misdirection and inventive play-calling that could really punish the OU defense. Sadly, Texas seems fairly inept in running it (why is there a QB draw in a package designed entirely around the run?).
It might prove useful, or likely it will be used a few times early, be enveloped in tacklers perhaps resulting in a turnover, and shelved for the entire 2nd half.
5). The Running back draw: Humor me. We haven’t seen it in a few years save for one attempt against Ohio St. on 3rd and long that was immediately destroyed. However, if it were pulled out again ala 2007 I believe Fozzy could find success. At least, if we have practiced it and can execute it on any level.
Now the crucial matchups:
Texas Offensive line vs. OU defensive line
Almost the exact same units faced off last season and Texas won the battle in the trenches. Gerald McCoy is a big mismatch for Chris Hall on the interior but Ulatoski and Hix should be able to keep Colt upright often enough against Beal and English on the edge. The real question is whether the line can get any push at any point in the running game against McCoy. Fortunately, they’ve had to hear that all week and Hall should be healthier while the injured Huey will be replaced by the strong David Snow inside. I’ll be shocked if Gerald McCoy isn’t double-teamed all day.
Travis Lewis, Ryan Reynolds and Keenan Clayton vs. Fozzy Whittaker/John Chiles
We’ve covered Fozzy vs. OU. If he gets 20 chances and any blocks I think he can break some big plays in the running and passing game. Meanwhile, Texas is building up a pretty strong screen game with the tunnel screen to the wide receiver and the bubble screen to Chiles. However, Travis Lewis is a quick-moving mauler and Reynolds will know the tendencies. They may be able to shut down these useful short-passing plays. The Wild Chiles should be breaking teams apart but given its lack of success against Colorado it’ll probably be eaten by this bunch.
Colt McCoy vs. OU safeties
The safeties are faster this year and also less experienced. I’m not giving anyone an edge on Colt. If he can get out on some unplanned runs, break containment and pick up a few first downs it could be game, set, match.
Jordan Shipley vs. the World
He’s the most underrated player in college football. Perhaps because he is white his speed and athleticism are undervalued while his amazing hands and routes are recognized but still underappreciated. Another 100 yard receiving game with a punt or kickoff TD would just about make him one of the most feared players in the history of the rivalry. I like his chances.
Indeed, the real hope is Special Teams, where Texas has become the most dominant unit in the country. DJ Monroe and Shipley on kickoffs, the punt-blocking game mixed with Shipley returning punts, and the rugby and distance punts combine to form a unit that will probably give Texas its best chance to score on OU.
I expect this to occur often enough to result in at least 28 points for Texas. I can’t see how OU keeps up with that kind of number so we could be looking at a dominating Texas win. We’ll see what kind of magic Bradford and Colt have going.
The linebackers are often 5 yards off the line of scrimmage and the corners play very soft on the outside receivers. They keep the Texas receivers in front of them and force Colt to complete dink and dunk passes for 70 yard drives in order to score and wait for the inevitable failed running play or incomplete pass to kill the drive. If the offense is particularly predictable the defense has time to react…good thing that’s not an issue with Texas…
Normally, you would simply run against a 6 man front with the linebackers playing so far off the ball and be very satisfied to move the ball 5-6 yards at a time and see if you can catch a few big plays from play-action if the defense gets tired of watching you execute short passes and running plays. Texas tried this very strategy against Colorado, running the ball and attempting to work the play-action game. Unfortunately, this same prevent-style defense sets up linebackers very well against the Texas running game.
All the outside-zone runs, counters and traps that Texas ran against Colorado are slow-developing and very easy to pick up on. With a few play-action exceptions, if you see a Texas guard moving in a direction, you can count on the ball going there as well. With the linebackers sitting further back, the Texas linemen have a longer way to go to reach them on blocks. If the opponents are at all familiar with our simple running game it’s not hard to fly downhill and blow up the attempted run.
Will Oklahoma employ this strategy of playing off Texas? It’s hard to say because Stoops and Venables have so much pride that forces them to play 3 linebackers in virtually all scenarios still while also attempting to defend the entire field. However, besides tighter coverage on the outside receivers you can probably count on OU playing a little zone and aggressively coming down on our plays as soon as they read them out just like every year.
I hope this paints a fairly bleak picture of Texas’ offensive chances against OU because on the surface that’s exactly what it is. A struggling offense vs. a defense primed to take advantage.
In the big scheme of things, OU’s defense was schematically ahead of Texas’ offense until 2005 when Vince could pass or throw and no defense stood a chance. After overcoming the hump of actually scoring more than 20 points against Stoops, Greg Davis finally figured out how to attack him. In 2007 Texas played one of it’s finest offensive games under Mack Brown in the series and lost as a result of dumb 4rth quarter defense and 2 costly turnovers (one of which cost a touchdown and momentum).
In that game Jermichael Finley had 4 receptions for 149 yards and a touchdown. Young Blaine Irby also had a 26 yard catch. Boom, suddenly Greg Davis knew what to do. Before the 2008 game Blaine Irby blew out his knee and Davis inserted Shipley into the new Flex tight end position in a 4-Wide Receiver offense and this resulted in 11 catches for 112 yards and a touchdown.
Mack Brown pointed out this week that Davis gets criticized for the running game while avoiding praise for his brilliant passing game. True enough, he doesn’t get a lot of credit for an excellent college passing game, although you would like to see more than 50% comprehension of the various possibilities presented by offensive football. In 2007 he unveiled a good counter and running back draw for Jamaal Charles that resulted in 79 yards on 17 carries before a costly Charles fumble moved Davis to abandon the running game and any chance of winning.
Furthermore, we never really saw the running back draw again, despite it being the obvious staple of a pass-first offense such as Texas employs. Last year Texas found success in the running game by virtue of the OU defense simply wearing down to the point of being unable to fight off pulling guards and catch Chris Ogbonnaya. That was surprising then but not totally unlikely for this year.
This particular incarnation of OU’s defense was expected to be the greatest since perhaps the 2000 championship unit. Fortunately, I can say with confidence that it is definitively not. We’ll go over matchups later but overall the team has the same basic strengths and weakness as it does every year. They are vulnerable to misdirection, because of their aggression, and passes against the middle of the field.
This year Texas has one of its best weapons to date for attacking the middle in Dan Buckner. As excellent a receiver as Jordan Shipley is, perhaps the best to ever even play at Texas, playing flex tight end is not maximizing his potential. Dan Buckner has more of the size and strength to play over the middle and be a large target for Colt to find.
Given a decent amount of time in the pocket there should be plenty of options for Colt to hit. OU’s defensive line is strong and Jeremy Beals is an excellent pass-rusher but Venables typically insists on calling zone blitzes that Colt will read and exploit when they choose to use them. The real question is whether or not Texas can run the ball sufficiently to win.
There are a few reasons why I am optimistic that Texas will find a way to do so. Vondrell McGee and Tre Newton are both injured and there is consequently no temptation for Texas to try and employ them against the OU defense. This might be a good thing given their skill sets and what Texas needs in this game. Additionally, the mythical Fozzy beast is rumored to be 100 percent for this game and is listed as co-starter with Cody Johnson. Fozzy has the skill set Texas should be looking for.
Miami found a way to run the ball on OU to the tune of 150 yards on 15 carries for Javarris James. My extensive film study (watching the game on DVR while drifting in and out of consciousness) revealed that OU’s front 7 is not actually as strong as was suspected in the preseason.
Ryan Reynolds is a perfect example of the typical weakness of an OU defense. When he correctly diagnoses the play, he flies downhill to the ball and blows things up. If you ask him to move laterally, confuse him and lure him into taking false steps, or ask him to cover a mobile receiver over the middle you set him up for failure. He has 2 surgically repaired knees and blew one of them in last year’s game.
Gerald McCoy, for all the talk, was taken out of the game against Miami by consistent double teams and the rest of that front 7 didn’t exploit the resulting freedom with any resounding success.
So, how can Texas run the ball successfully against OU? Why does it matter that Fozzy Bear will be getting the first chance to make something happen?
There are a few ways that I think are remotely likely to occur that might result in running game success that would put this game away. I’ve listed them in order of likelihood.
1). Exhaustion by the OU defense: Given a likely no-huddle pace combined with little chance for success by the OU offense this is the best bet.
2). Cutbacks by Fozzy: The best run against Colorado was the late touchdown run when, after the play was blown up again, Fozzy just reversed field and ran around the defense. While that might be a bit much to expect a few cutback runs could take Ryan Reynolds out of the picture and possibly result in some big runs.
3). The no-huddle under-center game: Texas runs the ball best from the no-huddle when teams get tired and linebackers are backpedaling against the pass. Against ULM Texas ran an excellent under-center no-huddle series and then mostly shelved it up until now. Breaking out the inside-zone (based on cutback runs) and then using play-action could get some big plays on the OU defense.
4). Wild Chiles: The Wild Horn formation, which I insist should be commonly known as “the wild Chiles” has many elements of misdirection and inventive play-calling that could really punish the OU defense. Sadly, Texas seems fairly inept in running it (why is there a QB draw in a package designed entirely around the run?).
It might prove useful, or likely it will be used a few times early, be enveloped in tacklers perhaps resulting in a turnover, and shelved for the entire 2nd half.
5). The Running back draw: Humor me. We haven’t seen it in a few years save for one attempt against Ohio St. on 3rd and long that was immediately destroyed. However, if it were pulled out again ala 2007 I believe Fozzy could find success. At least, if we have practiced it and can execute it on any level.
Now the crucial matchups:
Texas Offensive line vs. OU defensive line
Almost the exact same units faced off last season and Texas won the battle in the trenches. Gerald McCoy is a big mismatch for Chris Hall on the interior but Ulatoski and Hix should be able to keep Colt upright often enough against Beal and English on the edge. The real question is whether the line can get any push at any point in the running game against McCoy. Fortunately, they’ve had to hear that all week and Hall should be healthier while the injured Huey will be replaced by the strong David Snow inside. I’ll be shocked if Gerald McCoy isn’t double-teamed all day.
Travis Lewis, Ryan Reynolds and Keenan Clayton vs. Fozzy Whittaker/John Chiles
We’ve covered Fozzy vs. OU. If he gets 20 chances and any blocks I think he can break some big plays in the running and passing game. Meanwhile, Texas is building up a pretty strong screen game with the tunnel screen to the wide receiver and the bubble screen to Chiles. However, Travis Lewis is a quick-moving mauler and Reynolds will know the tendencies. They may be able to shut down these useful short-passing plays. The Wild Chiles should be breaking teams apart but given its lack of success against Colorado it’ll probably be eaten by this bunch.
Colt McCoy vs. OU safeties
The safeties are faster this year and also less experienced. I’m not giving anyone an edge on Colt. If he can get out on some unplanned runs, break containment and pick up a few first downs it could be game, set, match.
Jordan Shipley vs. the World
He’s the most underrated player in college football. Perhaps because he is white his speed and athleticism are undervalued while his amazing hands and routes are recognized but still underappreciated. Another 100 yard receiving game with a punt or kickoff TD would just about make him one of the most feared players in the history of the rivalry. I like his chances.
Indeed, the real hope is Special Teams, where Texas has become the most dominant unit in the country. DJ Monroe and Shipley on kickoffs, the punt-blocking game mixed with Shipley returning punts, and the rugby and distance punts combine to form a unit that will probably give Texas its best chance to score on OU.
I expect this to occur often enough to result in at least 28 points for Texas. I can’t see how OU keeps up with that kind of number so we could be looking at a dominating Texas win. We’ll see what kind of magic Bradford and Colt have going.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Vengeance belongs to Muschamp: defensing the Sooners
Before the season began I was highly skeptical of this Oklahoma offense. Last year’s unit overwhelmed every team they faced except Texas and Florida who actually had the speed on the line and in the secondary to handle OU’s hurry-up juggernaut, then they struggled. Texas and Florida both did tremendous damage against the vaunted OU offensive line, limited or simply ruined the running game and pressured Bradford away from dominance.
In every other game that enormous and experienced line bullied the other teams into total submission to the will of the visored one. Then all but one of those lineman graduated or left along with the majority of the OU receiving corp.
Then Jermaine Gresham, one of 3 legitimate offensive weapons, went down for the season before it began. Then Sam Bradford went down for a few games. Then Ryan Broyles broke his scapula and if you think he can actually play Saturday then you’re Bob Stoops.
That leaves Oklahoma with Sam Bradford and DeMarco Murray as possible heros against Texas on Saturday.
Before the season began the gameplan for Oklahoma was probably going to focus on double TE sets with lots of power-running against Texas’ new defensive tackles mixed with play-action passes to Gresham. This would protect Bradford and the line from the Texas pass-rush while exploiting the 2 places where OU might have advantages, 1). Gresham downfield (a mismatch for any college defense to handle) and 2). Running the ball with Murray and Chris Brown against the Texas tackles.
However, as the season has progressed, Oklahoma’s running game has been suspect and the threat from a TE or any downfield receiver is virtually non-existent with Broyles injured. As it now stands, there are no places on the field where Oklahoma has any kind of real matchup advantage against the Texas defense. In the few places where Texas is vulnerable or less than excellent Oklahoma is mediocre or poor.
Given that fact, the Sooner offense is left with the gameplan of throwing the ball over and over from spread sets in the hurry up offense while frequently mixing in running back draws to try and punish the Texas line for rushing upfield in their zeal to murder Bradford and after that is accomplished, Landry Jones. Bradford will have to be extremely accurate and healthy for the entire game in order for Oklahoma to score at all barring major defensive or special teams success.
On the other side Will Muschamp has a lot more to play with. Texas can rotate from a 3-4 to a 4-3, or a 3-3-5 to a 4-2-5 with the same 11 players and has done so all year. This will allow the Texas defense to mix up the Sooner offensive line’s blocking assignments despite the hurried pace by Oklahoma. The inexperienced Oklahoma line will have little time to organize which overwhelming Texas defender they are going to have to try and block on most snaps. Given also the lack of clear mismatches that favor the Sooners, Texas is very free to experiment schematically without being afraid of leaving players in dangerous positions.
The only truly dangerous position for Texas is if Bradford has a lot of time to throw. Therefore, stopping him is first priority. If OU shows some life in the running game, Texas can play some cover-1 and drop a safety down to help out. If Oklahoma’s running game is dead Texas can play some Cover-2 man under or Cover-1 or Cover-3 zone with heavy blitzing.
All of these are likely. Texas blitzed frequently against a Tech passing game that was much more dangerous than OU and isn’t afraid of leaving Aaron Williams or the Browns against whomever it is that plays receiver at OU this season. Overall, whatever OU shows early success with Texas can scheme against with greater resources.
Now let’s examine some of the crucial matchups in the game
Trent Williams vs. Sam Acho/Sergio Kindle
Trent Williams is regarded as an NFL level left-tackle with a lot of speed and pass-protection talent. I think he is vastly overrated and personally watched Sergio Kindle murder him last year with less refined moves than he is operating with this season. Meanwhile, Miami sacked Landry Jones 3 times, including one by Trent Williams’ assignment. If OU is dropping back to throw 40-50 times, which they probably must, I predict Sergio will cost Trent millions in the draft as Orakpo did Loadholt last season.
check out :43 to see Kindle after matching up on Trent in 2008.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOLNdu2LI9M&feature=player_embedded
Jarvis Jones vs. Sam Acho/Sergio Kindle
Texas moves the Predator around a lot and he may find himself up against OU’s Right tackle, Jarvis Jones, as well in this game. Sam Acho has 5 sacks thus far in the season and should be a major concern for Oklahoma. Sergio Kindle must be keeping Jones awake at night with fits of terror. Jarvis Jones is a terrible matchup for Kindle, Acho, Eddie Jones, or any of the other better pass-rushers at Texas. This is exhibit A in why it might be criminally irresponsible for Stoops to risk Bradford in this game.
OU receivers vs. Texas Secondary
The only place in the Texas secondary that is potentially vulnerable is Blake Gideon deep. He’s slow and doesn’t offer a ton of deep support. However, he is imminently competent and more than good enough to handle the deep passing threats from OU. Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams should be able to completely lock down their matchups in press-coverage.
DeMarco Murray/Chris Brown vs. Texas linebacker corp
This is the best linebacker Corp Texas has had in a long time. I don’t even know how long because it might have been before I was born that a better group roamed the field in burnt orange and white. OU is likely to use the RB draws that were successful against Miami along with their complement of great screens to try and utilize their only remaining weapons. Fortunately, Texas is proving itself to be one of the best defenses in the screen game in modern college football. Muckelroy is great at sniffing these out along with Houston and the Texas defensive ends. Count that as another OU strength negated by injury or Texas strength.
Sam Bradford vs. Earl Thomas
If Bradford is wise he will try and avoid little Earl when possible and increase the likelihood of a turnover free game from OU which is a necessity for a Sooner victory. Earl can end the game with a few route jumps or a pic-six. Last year one of his 2 interceptions made a big difference. This is tough to call but with the addition of a Texas pass-rush this looks like a likely Texas win.
At the end of the day I have trouble finding ways for Oklahoma to score that don’t result from fantastic field position granted by defense and special teams. I guess we’ll have to examine those to see how this will play out…
In every other game that enormous and experienced line bullied the other teams into total submission to the will of the visored one. Then all but one of those lineman graduated or left along with the majority of the OU receiving corp.
Then Jermaine Gresham, one of 3 legitimate offensive weapons, went down for the season before it began. Then Sam Bradford went down for a few games. Then Ryan Broyles broke his scapula and if you think he can actually play Saturday then you’re Bob Stoops.
That leaves Oklahoma with Sam Bradford and DeMarco Murray as possible heros against Texas on Saturday.
Before the season began the gameplan for Oklahoma was probably going to focus on double TE sets with lots of power-running against Texas’ new defensive tackles mixed with play-action passes to Gresham. This would protect Bradford and the line from the Texas pass-rush while exploiting the 2 places where OU might have advantages, 1). Gresham downfield (a mismatch for any college defense to handle) and 2). Running the ball with Murray and Chris Brown against the Texas tackles.
However, as the season has progressed, Oklahoma’s running game has been suspect and the threat from a TE or any downfield receiver is virtually non-existent with Broyles injured. As it now stands, there are no places on the field where Oklahoma has any kind of real matchup advantage against the Texas defense. In the few places where Texas is vulnerable or less than excellent Oklahoma is mediocre or poor.
Given that fact, the Sooner offense is left with the gameplan of throwing the ball over and over from spread sets in the hurry up offense while frequently mixing in running back draws to try and punish the Texas line for rushing upfield in their zeal to murder Bradford and after that is accomplished, Landry Jones. Bradford will have to be extremely accurate and healthy for the entire game in order for Oklahoma to score at all barring major defensive or special teams success.
On the other side Will Muschamp has a lot more to play with. Texas can rotate from a 3-4 to a 4-3, or a 3-3-5 to a 4-2-5 with the same 11 players and has done so all year. This will allow the Texas defense to mix up the Sooner offensive line’s blocking assignments despite the hurried pace by Oklahoma. The inexperienced Oklahoma line will have little time to organize which overwhelming Texas defender they are going to have to try and block on most snaps. Given also the lack of clear mismatches that favor the Sooners, Texas is very free to experiment schematically without being afraid of leaving players in dangerous positions.
The only truly dangerous position for Texas is if Bradford has a lot of time to throw. Therefore, stopping him is first priority. If OU shows some life in the running game, Texas can play some cover-1 and drop a safety down to help out. If Oklahoma’s running game is dead Texas can play some Cover-2 man under or Cover-1 or Cover-3 zone with heavy blitzing.
All of these are likely. Texas blitzed frequently against a Tech passing game that was much more dangerous than OU and isn’t afraid of leaving Aaron Williams or the Browns against whomever it is that plays receiver at OU this season. Overall, whatever OU shows early success with Texas can scheme against with greater resources.
Now let’s examine some of the crucial matchups in the game
Trent Williams vs. Sam Acho/Sergio Kindle
Trent Williams is regarded as an NFL level left-tackle with a lot of speed and pass-protection talent. I think he is vastly overrated and personally watched Sergio Kindle murder him last year with less refined moves than he is operating with this season. Meanwhile, Miami sacked Landry Jones 3 times, including one by Trent Williams’ assignment. If OU is dropping back to throw 40-50 times, which they probably must, I predict Sergio will cost Trent millions in the draft as Orakpo did Loadholt last season.
check out :43 to see Kindle after matching up on Trent in 2008.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOLNdu2LI9M&feature=player_embedded
Jarvis Jones vs. Sam Acho/Sergio Kindle
Texas moves the Predator around a lot and he may find himself up against OU’s Right tackle, Jarvis Jones, as well in this game. Sam Acho has 5 sacks thus far in the season and should be a major concern for Oklahoma. Sergio Kindle must be keeping Jones awake at night with fits of terror. Jarvis Jones is a terrible matchup for Kindle, Acho, Eddie Jones, or any of the other better pass-rushers at Texas. This is exhibit A in why it might be criminally irresponsible for Stoops to risk Bradford in this game.
OU receivers vs. Texas Secondary
The only place in the Texas secondary that is potentially vulnerable is Blake Gideon deep. He’s slow and doesn’t offer a ton of deep support. However, he is imminently competent and more than good enough to handle the deep passing threats from OU. Curtis Brown and Aaron Williams should be able to completely lock down their matchups in press-coverage.
DeMarco Murray/Chris Brown vs. Texas linebacker corp
This is the best linebacker Corp Texas has had in a long time. I don’t even know how long because it might have been before I was born that a better group roamed the field in burnt orange and white. OU is likely to use the RB draws that were successful against Miami along with their complement of great screens to try and utilize their only remaining weapons. Fortunately, Texas is proving itself to be one of the best defenses in the screen game in modern college football. Muckelroy is great at sniffing these out along with Houston and the Texas defensive ends. Count that as another OU strength negated by injury or Texas strength.
Sam Bradford vs. Earl Thomas
If Bradford is wise he will try and avoid little Earl when possible and increase the likelihood of a turnover free game from OU which is a necessity for a Sooner victory. Earl can end the game with a few route jumps or a pic-six. Last year one of his 2 interceptions made a big difference. This is tough to call but with the addition of a Texas pass-rush this looks like a likely Texas win.
At the end of the day I have trouble finding ways for Oklahoma to score that don’t result from fantastic field position granted by defense and special teams. I guess we’ll have to examine those to see how this will play out…
Monday, October 5, 2009
How about those Cowboys?
It’s time to talk about your Dallas Cowboys. I say your because I gave up Dallas fandom after the last superbowl win (1995, incidentally, also the last Dallas playoff win unless I’m mistaken). I grew less enamored with pro football for a brief period but I stand by that choice one hundred percent. The hiring of Barry Switzer alone should have driven away all the cowboy fans, or at least warned them, if not the decade and a half of Jerry Jones incompetence that followed it. Now I find the Cowboys to be a hateable franchise with unlikable players and staff.
As it is, I can’t help but be fairly invested in the Cowboys for a few reasons. First is that they are the most prominent local pro team and consequently are on television every Sunday. Second is that I watch football frequently with my pal Nathan and he’s a Cowboys fan. I enjoy taking shots at Dallas and Tony Romo and casting aspersions on the quality of person who might root for the Cowboys but I feel the ‘boys are beginning to get a bum rep.
They are 2-2 with losses to undefeated Denver on the road and the powerful looking New York Giants. Both of these games were winnable and featured poor 2nd halves by Tony Romo. It’s partly because these games were close that Dallas is getting so much criticism. The perception is that they have as much talent as anyone and are blowing it with sloppy play. Tony Romo is being chided as someone who can’t win the big game and Roy Williams as a prima donna.
Both of those criticisms are actually pretty fair, I would admit, but there is a deeper issue with this team that comes back to the real reason for the Cowboys failure to win a superbowl in the salary cap era…Jerry Jones.
Jerry Jones is in love with a man named Jason Garrett. Jason Garrett is a young man who has been charged with coordinating the Dallas offensives in their contests this season. Unless I’m missing something, which is more than possible, Jason Garrett is the type of coach who has a system he wants to run and he’ll assemble his pieces into that puzzle however best they fit. Allow me to demonstrate using my common sense powers. To begin with, what weapons does Dallas have to work with on offense?
1). A big, powerful Offensive line: These guys are all large and a handful to deal with in the running game. Flozelle Adams comes and goes as a dominant pass-blocking left tackle and generally has some trouble with speed rushers but when it comes to moving forward this unit is good.
2). 2 upper-tier Tight ends: Martellus Bennet is a good run-blocker and very solid receiving option. Jason Whitten is a good blocker, excellent receiving option and one of the best all around Tight ends in the known football world.
3). A stable of very good Running backs: They have power runner Marion Barber, great all-around back Tashard Choice, and home-run hitter Felix Jones. That’s 3 guys who could start and be excellent in all phases of the game.
4). Tony Romo: Romo is great on the run as an improvisational guy and a very good talent overall. He could really burn teams in the right system.
Now, the weaknesses:
1). Pass protection from the O-line: They can actually be very solid and held back a Giants D-line that is excellent in getting after the quarterback. Frankly, this line isn’t very consistent. Flozelle Adams has had big trouble, as previously noted, with speed rushers. I think, given the opportunity to bang head every week, they might enjoy an identity as a bruising run-blocking team.
2). The Receivers: They lost TO, who was a very good receiver if nothing else. Now they have some mediocre possesion guys and a couple of downfield targets in Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton. Neither of these are guys who you want to throw to 10-15 times per game. They are limited in functionality.
3). Tony Romo: Whatever he may or may not become, he is not currently a Manning/Brees/Brady type guy who you want to build your offense around. Or if he is, he needs better pass protection and receivers to work with.
Now, given all those pieces, what would be the ideal type of offense to run? Well, whatever that might be Garret has chosen to run a Steve-Spurrier style scheme built around Romo throwing the ball 30-40 times per game and a short game featuring misdirection with draws, counters and screens.
When Dallas runs the counter, draw or screen they have a lot of success. These are excellent plays in general that Dallas can execute very well, but given the team’s strengths to feature a pass-first offense that features the running game as a constraint option is frankly stupid. The screen, draw and, to a lesser extent, the counter are all plays that are designed to punish a team for selling out against what a team does best. What Dallas does best are these constraint plays, they are averaging 6 yards per rush right now. That number even includes rushes made by Tony Romo. Dallas ran the ball 7 times in the 2nd half against Denver despite holding a lead until the 4rth quarter. 7 times. Stupid.
Perhaps Tony Romo will always fail in big games and I was the first to decry his performance against the Giants and didn’t fail to notice him missing receivers against Denver. But Jason Garrett is not putting him in a position to be successful. There wouldn’t be anything wrong with his scheme if he was coordinating the New England Patriots but the Dallas Cowboys have very different personnel.
Given their strengths a much more obvious scheme would feature the same draws, counters and screens built around a power-running game with drive-blocking and play-action passes with Romo rolling out to find his tight ends or hitting Roy Williams or Patrick Crayton shooting downfield. This team is perfectly built for this traditional style offense. I love the spread and passing as much as anyone but this team has great talent that simply isn’t built for that style.
On defense they have a very solid squad that played well against Denver and the other games I’ve seen this season. There isn’t anything wrong here and Wade Phillips knows what he’s doing with these guys. If they can change their identity on offense (probably too late) and create a system that makes sense then maybe we can see Tony Romo become comfortable enough to overcome the hump. In the meantime, they are wasting talent. Of course, that’s just fine with me I hate them anyways.
As it is, I can’t help but be fairly invested in the Cowboys for a few reasons. First is that they are the most prominent local pro team and consequently are on television every Sunday. Second is that I watch football frequently with my pal Nathan and he’s a Cowboys fan. I enjoy taking shots at Dallas and Tony Romo and casting aspersions on the quality of person who might root for the Cowboys but I feel the ‘boys are beginning to get a bum rep.
They are 2-2 with losses to undefeated Denver on the road and the powerful looking New York Giants. Both of these games were winnable and featured poor 2nd halves by Tony Romo. It’s partly because these games were close that Dallas is getting so much criticism. The perception is that they have as much talent as anyone and are blowing it with sloppy play. Tony Romo is being chided as someone who can’t win the big game and Roy Williams as a prima donna.
Both of those criticisms are actually pretty fair, I would admit, but there is a deeper issue with this team that comes back to the real reason for the Cowboys failure to win a superbowl in the salary cap era…Jerry Jones.
Jerry Jones is in love with a man named Jason Garrett. Jason Garrett is a young man who has been charged with coordinating the Dallas offensives in their contests this season. Unless I’m missing something, which is more than possible, Jason Garrett is the type of coach who has a system he wants to run and he’ll assemble his pieces into that puzzle however best they fit. Allow me to demonstrate using my common sense powers. To begin with, what weapons does Dallas have to work with on offense?
1). A big, powerful Offensive line: These guys are all large and a handful to deal with in the running game. Flozelle Adams comes and goes as a dominant pass-blocking left tackle and generally has some trouble with speed rushers but when it comes to moving forward this unit is good.
2). 2 upper-tier Tight ends: Martellus Bennet is a good run-blocker and very solid receiving option. Jason Whitten is a good blocker, excellent receiving option and one of the best all around Tight ends in the known football world.
3). A stable of very good Running backs: They have power runner Marion Barber, great all-around back Tashard Choice, and home-run hitter Felix Jones. That’s 3 guys who could start and be excellent in all phases of the game.
4). Tony Romo: Romo is great on the run as an improvisational guy and a very good talent overall. He could really burn teams in the right system.
Now, the weaknesses:
1). Pass protection from the O-line: They can actually be very solid and held back a Giants D-line that is excellent in getting after the quarterback. Frankly, this line isn’t very consistent. Flozelle Adams has had big trouble, as previously noted, with speed rushers. I think, given the opportunity to bang head every week, they might enjoy an identity as a bruising run-blocking team.
2). The Receivers: They lost TO, who was a very good receiver if nothing else. Now they have some mediocre possesion guys and a couple of downfield targets in Roy Williams and Patrick Crayton. Neither of these are guys who you want to throw to 10-15 times per game. They are limited in functionality.
3). Tony Romo: Whatever he may or may not become, he is not currently a Manning/Brees/Brady type guy who you want to build your offense around. Or if he is, he needs better pass protection and receivers to work with.
Now, given all those pieces, what would be the ideal type of offense to run? Well, whatever that might be Garret has chosen to run a Steve-Spurrier style scheme built around Romo throwing the ball 30-40 times per game and a short game featuring misdirection with draws, counters and screens.
When Dallas runs the counter, draw or screen they have a lot of success. These are excellent plays in general that Dallas can execute very well, but given the team’s strengths to feature a pass-first offense that features the running game as a constraint option is frankly stupid. The screen, draw and, to a lesser extent, the counter are all plays that are designed to punish a team for selling out against what a team does best. What Dallas does best are these constraint plays, they are averaging 6 yards per rush right now. That number even includes rushes made by Tony Romo. Dallas ran the ball 7 times in the 2nd half against Denver despite holding a lead until the 4rth quarter. 7 times. Stupid.
Perhaps Tony Romo will always fail in big games and I was the first to decry his performance against the Giants and didn’t fail to notice him missing receivers against Denver. But Jason Garrett is not putting him in a position to be successful. There wouldn’t be anything wrong with his scheme if he was coordinating the New England Patriots but the Dallas Cowboys have very different personnel.
Given their strengths a much more obvious scheme would feature the same draws, counters and screens built around a power-running game with drive-blocking and play-action passes with Romo rolling out to find his tight ends or hitting Roy Williams or Patrick Crayton shooting downfield. This team is perfectly built for this traditional style offense. I love the spread and passing as much as anyone but this team has great talent that simply isn’t built for that style.
On defense they have a very solid squad that played well against Denver and the other games I’ve seen this season. There isn’t anything wrong here and Wade Phillips knows what he’s doing with these guys. If they can change their identity on offense (probably too late) and create a system that makes sense then maybe we can see Tony Romo become comfortable enough to overcome the hump. In the meantime, they are wasting talent. Of course, that’s just fine with me I hate them anyways.
Thursday, September 24, 2009
The Tech game and thoughts on the team
A lot of people are a little worried about the team, mostly because we have little else to do before Texas plays Oklahoma, and the alleged return of "2007" Colt. I’m not sure where 2007 Colt was hiding last season, I’m guessing in 2007, but I’m pretty sure he’s still there. His 2nd half highlights look as good as anything from last year while his first half struggles are troublesome but not shocking. Remember, we didn’t realize how good 2008 Colt was until the Oklahoma game. He hadn’t been tested and Texas had gotten off to some slow starts, most notably the UTEP game.
He’s missing Quan Cosby and Brandon Collins, 2 receivers whom he had developed a lot of timing with, and even offenses with returning starters take a little time to gel. I’ll be worried if we don’t break 50 over the next few games. In the meantime, I’m not.
Taylor Potts was not the player I expected. I had anticipated better throwing mechanics, less courage and less accuracy. Much has been made of his performance and resistance to blitzes. I was as shocked as anyone when he took Predator’s spear through the chest and continued to make sidearm throws in tight windows. However, in instances of actual pressure he was not excellent. Texas held Tech to 3 points in the first half getting pressure on Potts and ended late drives in the 4rth quarter with pressure. So, the man is not quite a legend yet. He played well after taking pressure but when the rush was approaching he was as poor as any hurried quarterback.
Overall I was impressed with the performances in the Tech game both by the pirates and the Longhorns. I’d like to do a unit summary of the team’s performance thus far in the season, and particularly in the Texas Tech game which I’ve now reviewed.
Offensive Line:
It all starts here on offense, and the play begins when Chris Hall snaps the ball. Rewatching the game, I found myself playing a game called “watch Chris” which I recommend as an enlightening experience. He is solid in pass protection, although he gives inside push to good tackles (like Colby Whitlock, or, gulp, Gerald McCoy). I’m assuming he has a very good grasp of the offensive protections and schemes and calls them well. Ultimately, however, he is a terrible run-blocker. He gets absolutely no push off the line, and in fact allows deep penetration up the middle which frequently kill running plays. He’s at his best in protection mode, sealing defenders away from the direction of the run rather than driving them away, or getting out in the screen game (he made an amazing block for Chiles on a screen in the first half). I can understand why he starts and he has some strengths which play to the strengths of our offense. But if you want to know why Texas has so many negative or no-yardage runs play a little “watch Chris”.
Texas will not move the ball on OU using the inside-zone (although it is much more effective in no-huddle as I predicted) because there will be no push against McCoy and co. in the middle. You may think Tre Newton is the answer, and personally I’m a fan, but Texas will have to rely on sweeps and counters to run on OU.
Charlie Tanner has received a lot of criticism as well but I just didn’t notice him much in this game. I believe he, like Hall, excels in understanding what the coaches want and playing to a couple of strengths that allows him to start despite big flaws. Ulatoski was overrated by preseason accolades and mention as a top 10 draft pick but he’s a championship caliber left tackle. Kyle Hix and Snow/Huey are the best we have.
Receivers:
I want to see Malcolm Williams involved more. He’s said to be inconsistent in practice but he’s clearly a guy that just needs to see some game success and he can take off. He has the talent to be the best in the league.
That said, John Chiles is a dangerous weapon and brings a lot when he’s on the field. First, there is the “Wildcat” package Texas can use him in without making a substitution, then there is his game changing speed and open field moves. As a recipient in the screen game he’s very valuable. Shipley is what we thought he was, Kirkendoll has been solid, Buckner is a rising star. It’s an excellent group.
Running backs:
Tre Newton is the best running back on the roster unless Fozzy can stay healthy and show something. His vision, developed from his time at Southlake Carrol and the spread offense at high school, sets him apart from the other backs. Cody Johnson is a great short-yardage runner. It’s nice to have an automatic first down/touchdown when necessary. Situational play can make this team a champion.
Defensive Line:
The line is better than anticipated. Lamarr Houston has been better than expected playing with a healthy ankle and full year from the position. Kheeston Randall is like a Blake Gideon at Nose Tackle. He can do all the necessary things, like taking on double teams without getting blown backwards, getting push up the middle in man on man, and so on. He’s not making a lot of plays but doing what Texas needs. Also, there isn’t much behind him.
Eddie Jones has been a very strong pass rusher, Sam Acho might become a star and the ends overall are amongst the best in the country. Sergio Kindle is one of the best defensive players in the nation. He is a certain top 10 draft pick. He can singlehandedly destroy a team and almost did so with the Taylor Potts sack. He bowled over lineman and went totally around veteran Marlon Winn. These were Tech lineman, bred and molded by Leach to stay in front of pass-rushers. Everything Leach does makes it easier for lineman but Kindle still dominated. The Potts fumble and Earl Thomas fumble were both directly caused by the Predator.
If it wasn’t enough that he’s an athlete way beyond the norm, Muschamp makes it easier for him by using the 3-3-5 and blitzing Kindle from all directions. If Texas doesn’t want to pit him against the other team’s left tackle they don’t have to do so, and the change can be made without substitution.
Linebackers:
Emmanuel Acho has stolen my heart. Between every game last season and this Blake Gideon has forced one turnover. The biggest leap to be made from good defense (2008) to elite defense (championship 09 defense) is forcing turnovers. Emmanuel Acho caused 2 fumbles against Tech in one half of football.
Acho and Keenan Robinson are spectacular linebackers of the variety that Texas needs in league games against spread passing teams. They blitz well, cover and tackle in space, and they force turnovers. I’m excited. Roddrick Muckleroy is actually one of the best linebackers in the Big 12.
Secondary:
While this has been a team strength it hasn’t been quite as elite as might have been excited by more hopeful prognosticators, like myself. I would rank the defensive backs as follows:
1). Earl Thomas
2). Aaron Williams
3). Curtis Brown
4). Chykie Brown
5). Blake Gideon
Teams are afraid to go anywhere near Earl when he’s playing back. He flies to the ball quickly and makes big hits. Aaron Williams is another playmaker and together with Earl is pushing this unit towards elite status. Curtis Brown is thrown to a lot (there isn’t much choice left) but it takes a good throw to beat him. He blankets outside receivers and isn’t a weakness but another cog that allows Texas to play coverages that free up the front 7 from responsibility other than murdering quarterbacks.
Shocking Brown has been a little disappointing this season allowing receivers to break free with good routes and moves. I’m not sure if his concentration has been down or what, but he’s been supplanted by Curtis and will have to earn his spot back. Blake Gideon is one of the most consistent players on the team, and it seems unfair to criticism him and not Kheeston Randall, but he’s the potential variable in the equation. Backup Christian Scott, if ever cleared academically, could be a player that gives Texas playmakers all over the coverage. Gideon is excellent at working very hard to be where he needs to be and making sure clean-up tackles on big plays but he can’t jump routes or react like Thomas does when the ball is in the air. Texas can dominate with Gideon, but Scott could make things really interesting.
Thus far then, we’re seeing a defense that might be Mack’s best and an offense likely to find it’s way into top form (with the addition of Newton and more stability from Colt). Don’t underestimate the effect of the no-huddle, when used more in league play, as well as Davis’ adjustments to all the soft coverages Texas is facing. So far, so good.
He’s missing Quan Cosby and Brandon Collins, 2 receivers whom he had developed a lot of timing with, and even offenses with returning starters take a little time to gel. I’ll be worried if we don’t break 50 over the next few games. In the meantime, I’m not.
Taylor Potts was not the player I expected. I had anticipated better throwing mechanics, less courage and less accuracy. Much has been made of his performance and resistance to blitzes. I was as shocked as anyone when he took Predator’s spear through the chest and continued to make sidearm throws in tight windows. However, in instances of actual pressure he was not excellent. Texas held Tech to 3 points in the first half getting pressure on Potts and ended late drives in the 4rth quarter with pressure. So, the man is not quite a legend yet. He played well after taking pressure but when the rush was approaching he was as poor as any hurried quarterback.
Overall I was impressed with the performances in the Tech game both by the pirates and the Longhorns. I’d like to do a unit summary of the team’s performance thus far in the season, and particularly in the Texas Tech game which I’ve now reviewed.
Offensive Line:
It all starts here on offense, and the play begins when Chris Hall snaps the ball. Rewatching the game, I found myself playing a game called “watch Chris” which I recommend as an enlightening experience. He is solid in pass protection, although he gives inside push to good tackles (like Colby Whitlock, or, gulp, Gerald McCoy). I’m assuming he has a very good grasp of the offensive protections and schemes and calls them well. Ultimately, however, he is a terrible run-blocker. He gets absolutely no push off the line, and in fact allows deep penetration up the middle which frequently kill running plays. He’s at his best in protection mode, sealing defenders away from the direction of the run rather than driving them away, or getting out in the screen game (he made an amazing block for Chiles on a screen in the first half). I can understand why he starts and he has some strengths which play to the strengths of our offense. But if you want to know why Texas has so many negative or no-yardage runs play a little “watch Chris”.
Texas will not move the ball on OU using the inside-zone (although it is much more effective in no-huddle as I predicted) because there will be no push against McCoy and co. in the middle. You may think Tre Newton is the answer, and personally I’m a fan, but Texas will have to rely on sweeps and counters to run on OU.
Charlie Tanner has received a lot of criticism as well but I just didn’t notice him much in this game. I believe he, like Hall, excels in understanding what the coaches want and playing to a couple of strengths that allows him to start despite big flaws. Ulatoski was overrated by preseason accolades and mention as a top 10 draft pick but he’s a championship caliber left tackle. Kyle Hix and Snow/Huey are the best we have.
Receivers:
I want to see Malcolm Williams involved more. He’s said to be inconsistent in practice but he’s clearly a guy that just needs to see some game success and he can take off. He has the talent to be the best in the league.
That said, John Chiles is a dangerous weapon and brings a lot when he’s on the field. First, there is the “Wildcat” package Texas can use him in without making a substitution, then there is his game changing speed and open field moves. As a recipient in the screen game he’s very valuable. Shipley is what we thought he was, Kirkendoll has been solid, Buckner is a rising star. It’s an excellent group.
Running backs:
Tre Newton is the best running back on the roster unless Fozzy can stay healthy and show something. His vision, developed from his time at Southlake Carrol and the spread offense at high school, sets him apart from the other backs. Cody Johnson is a great short-yardage runner. It’s nice to have an automatic first down/touchdown when necessary. Situational play can make this team a champion.
Defensive Line:
The line is better than anticipated. Lamarr Houston has been better than expected playing with a healthy ankle and full year from the position. Kheeston Randall is like a Blake Gideon at Nose Tackle. He can do all the necessary things, like taking on double teams without getting blown backwards, getting push up the middle in man on man, and so on. He’s not making a lot of plays but doing what Texas needs. Also, there isn’t much behind him.
Eddie Jones has been a very strong pass rusher, Sam Acho might become a star and the ends overall are amongst the best in the country. Sergio Kindle is one of the best defensive players in the nation. He is a certain top 10 draft pick. He can singlehandedly destroy a team and almost did so with the Taylor Potts sack. He bowled over lineman and went totally around veteran Marlon Winn. These were Tech lineman, bred and molded by Leach to stay in front of pass-rushers. Everything Leach does makes it easier for lineman but Kindle still dominated. The Potts fumble and Earl Thomas fumble were both directly caused by the Predator.
If it wasn’t enough that he’s an athlete way beyond the norm, Muschamp makes it easier for him by using the 3-3-5 and blitzing Kindle from all directions. If Texas doesn’t want to pit him against the other team’s left tackle they don’t have to do so, and the change can be made without substitution.
Linebackers:
Emmanuel Acho has stolen my heart. Between every game last season and this Blake Gideon has forced one turnover. The biggest leap to be made from good defense (2008) to elite defense (championship 09 defense) is forcing turnovers. Emmanuel Acho caused 2 fumbles against Tech in one half of football.
Acho and Keenan Robinson are spectacular linebackers of the variety that Texas needs in league games against spread passing teams. They blitz well, cover and tackle in space, and they force turnovers. I’m excited. Roddrick Muckleroy is actually one of the best linebackers in the Big 12.
Secondary:
While this has been a team strength it hasn’t been quite as elite as might have been excited by more hopeful prognosticators, like myself. I would rank the defensive backs as follows:
1). Earl Thomas
2). Aaron Williams
3). Curtis Brown
4). Chykie Brown
5). Blake Gideon
Teams are afraid to go anywhere near Earl when he’s playing back. He flies to the ball quickly and makes big hits. Aaron Williams is another playmaker and together with Earl is pushing this unit towards elite status. Curtis Brown is thrown to a lot (there isn’t much choice left) but it takes a good throw to beat him. He blankets outside receivers and isn’t a weakness but another cog that allows Texas to play coverages that free up the front 7 from responsibility other than murdering quarterbacks.
Shocking Brown has been a little disappointing this season allowing receivers to break free with good routes and moves. I’m not sure if his concentration has been down or what, but he’s been supplanted by Curtis and will have to earn his spot back. Blake Gideon is one of the most consistent players on the team, and it seems unfair to criticism him and not Kheeston Randall, but he’s the potential variable in the equation. Backup Christian Scott, if ever cleared academically, could be a player that gives Texas playmakers all over the coverage. Gideon is excellent at working very hard to be where he needs to be and making sure clean-up tackles on big plays but he can’t jump routes or react like Thomas does when the ball is in the air. Texas can dominate with Gideon, but Scott could make things really interesting.
Thus far then, we’re seeing a defense that might be Mack’s best and an offense likely to find it’s way into top form (with the addition of Newton and more stability from Colt). Don’t underestimate the effect of the no-huddle, when used more in league play, as well as Davis’ adjustments to all the soft coverages Texas is facing. So far, so good.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Flotsam and Jetsam
Let me begin by giving kudos to the Oklahoma Sooners for wasting no time in giving due credit for last year’s offensive success to Duke Robinson, Phil Loadholt and Jon Cooper. It took an entire offseason and a devastating first loss but they finally publicly showed their support for the previous offensive line’s legacy by demonstrating utter futility in Dallas yesterday. It won’t be the first time they do that this season. Nothing says “thanks for all the good work guys” like 9 penalties and a devastating series of hits on the best pocket quarterback in the school’s history (unless you count Troy Aikman, who was benched because the team ran the wishbone).
That said, they run-blocked pretty well as DeMarco Murray had 58 yards on 10 carries. Of course, when you find yourself in a vicious low-scoring cockfight there is no place for running the ball. Especially when you have a terrible, inexperienced quarterback throwing to a new cast of receivers missing their best player (Jermaine Gresham). Good job, Big Game Bob.
Oklahoma St. looked pretty solid. They punked a poor Georgia offense and their offense looked about like it did last season, very good if not quite elite. Perrish Cox looks phenomenal and the D-line was better than adequate. They’re still giving up loads of points against the Big 12 offenses and perhaps will hold down OU’s weak looking squad prompting undue credit to the new DC and further trashing of Todd Beckman.
Of course, we must talk about the Horns as well. Let’s start with
1). Special Teams:
I think our special teams will be a big difference maker this season. Potentially a game changing play will be made on special teams in Stillwater or Dallas. The punting is good, and all our kickers are as good as you might expect from college players. The return game is looking very promising. Earl Thomas wasn’t the greatest punt returner but he’s merely a placeholder. Jordan Shipley will play there when it matters most. DJ Monroe is perhaps the fastest player on the team and his participation on kick returns is pretty exciting.
2). Offense:
McCoy was McCoy. He threw a terrible INT but it’s early in the year. He’s going to be the best quarterback in the country. He still has some happy feet in the pocket and drifts out when it isn’t necessary to do so but overall, he was excellent and spread the ball to a big cast of receivers.
Speaking of the receivers, they look phenomenal. When Texas used the 4-wide receiver set with Dan Buckner in the TE-Flex spot they were picking up huge chunks of yards over the middle of the field. Jordan Shipley was used in that role last year and took some heavy punishment while torching OU and the rest of the Big 12. That Buckner can already occupy that role so well will mean great things for the offense. Kirkendoll looked over the middle as well.
The outside is very interesting. We didn’t see much of Malcolm Williams, which would be a great disappointment if not for the reason. The reason is John Chiles. He’s cut the the 15 pounds he needlessly added to play QB and he looks good in the open field. He’s a fantastic weapon for teams to account for, and teams just don’t have the resources in the back 7 to account for Chiles on the edge while defending the middle and the lethal Jordan Shipley.
Jordan might be the most underrated WR in the country. He’s really, really good. I don’t know what else to tell you. He does everything that WR’s are supposed to do well. He’s not huge and tall, that’s his only weakness.
The Texas running game pleased me greatly yesterday, except the fumbles. Greg Davis wisely chose not to scrap our zone-running game as I predicted in this space earlier. Instead, he did exactly what I proposed and expected and employed the inside and outside zones from a no-huddle offense with Vondrell McGee and successfully moved the ball down the field. He made 2 other tweaks that also generated some real results.
They moved Colt under center in the traditional 11 personnel (1 TE, 1 RB) formation we usually run from the shotgun and employed the zone-runs and play-action. We’ll see more of this later in the year. It’ll be a nice way to punish the over-aggressive Sooners.
Finally, they played DJ Monroe at RB and ran the old counter we really haven’t seen since Jamaal Charles left. I suppose they feel that you need great speed to the outside to run if effectively. At any rate, Monroe was a monster on the outside zone and counter and should see a lot of action in that role.
Between the 4 and 5 wide offense, the no-huddle under-center offense, DJ Monroe and the unstoppable jumbo package Texas has too many strengths on offense for any team to be able to handle.
On defense we showed a few interesting traits. We gave up some big plays, but the fact is that Texas will do that all year. Muschamp is going to play aggressively against what teams are running and leave Corners in single coverage and attack upfield. Now, there will be better execution down the road and you’ll see this defense play better and tighter but still give up some big plays in the running game or passing game as the competition intensifies.
The secondary looked pretty solid, barring the one play where Chykie blew coverage one on one and gave up a 75 yard TD pass. Ben Wells made a huge hit late in the game, hopefully this will give him confidence along with Christian Scott’s possible absence this season due to academic issues.
The Linebackers looked like an elite unit such as Texas hasn’t had since I started watching them. Roddrick Muckelroy picked up where he left off. Norton (hopefully not seriously injured) was good and a great inside back in our new 3-3-5 look. E. Acho and Keenan Robinson are fast strikers who can play in space or inside as necessary. I like them all a great deal.
Defensive End seems to have been the underrated strength of the team. Sam Acho might be better than I even dared to hope. Texas played the option last night about as poorly as they did when A&M used it to pull that disgusting upset in 2006 with the exception of Acho. When they ran it at Sergio he ran straight at the quarterback hoping to deliver a killing shot and set them up for the pitch that yielded some good runs. Acho played contain on the pitch man, forced the quarterback to keep it and created a fumble. He plays smart but is very athletic and gets in the backfield. Kindle, while a little over-aggressive on the option, is going to be phenomenal this season. He’s relentless in his pressure and athletic enough to punish teams on every play because of his pursuit. He might end Sam Bradford’s life this season. Alex Okafor also looked very good, and more importantly, he looked great against the run. Coming into the season he was supposed to be another pass-rushing weapon to rotate in against the hapless Big 12 quarterbacks we face but he demonstrated the know-how to use his penetration and athleticism to blow up the LA Monroe running game.
Houston played well but it was hard to evaluate DT play from the upper deck where I sat. Texas used the 4-2-5 under front they used for much of last season and also mixed in a lot of 3-3-5. I intended to write about the 3-3-5 before the season started but didn’t fully grasp what we’re doing with it.
Last season the front looked like this:
This year as follows:
Last season, Muschamp used the first front to create one-on-one matchups that paid big dividends for the pass-rush. The ends line up against the guards (who aren’t typically selected for their ability to defend the quarterback from quick rushers) and avoid double teams. Kindle could rush from the same side as Orakpo and prevent the Left tackle from coming to double Orakpo. If a team asked a guard to help double team Roy Miller they then had to also ask a tackle to slide inside 2 or 3 yards in time to block Orakpo or Houston, which is a little more useful than asking me to suit up and block Orakpo or Houston.
This season the ends are in the more traditional 5-tech, meaning they are lined up over the tackles instead of the guards. I’m not clear on the reasoning for this change but evidently Muschamp is not as interested in creating matchups for Kheeston Randall or Ben Alexander as he was with Roy Miller and I sympathize. Instead the linebackers we’ll have to take on guards inside more often and the ends have more responsibility, perfectly acceptable terms since these are team strengths. We’ll see how this front develops over the course of the season and what advantages it lends to Muschamp’s squad. Overall, I feel great about the defense, despite the 20 points allowed. They are fast and aggressive and will certainly create some turnovers. It also warrants mentioning that despite allowing 20 points, the defense only gave up 298 yards for the game yesterday.
So far so good, bring on Wyoming…
That said, they run-blocked pretty well as DeMarco Murray had 58 yards on 10 carries. Of course, when you find yourself in a vicious low-scoring cockfight there is no place for running the ball. Especially when you have a terrible, inexperienced quarterback throwing to a new cast of receivers missing their best player (Jermaine Gresham). Good job, Big Game Bob.
Oklahoma St. looked pretty solid. They punked a poor Georgia offense and their offense looked about like it did last season, very good if not quite elite. Perrish Cox looks phenomenal and the D-line was better than adequate. They’re still giving up loads of points against the Big 12 offenses and perhaps will hold down OU’s weak looking squad prompting undue credit to the new DC and further trashing of Todd Beckman.
Of course, we must talk about the Horns as well. Let’s start with
1). Special Teams:
I think our special teams will be a big difference maker this season. Potentially a game changing play will be made on special teams in Stillwater or Dallas. The punting is good, and all our kickers are as good as you might expect from college players. The return game is looking very promising. Earl Thomas wasn’t the greatest punt returner but he’s merely a placeholder. Jordan Shipley will play there when it matters most. DJ Monroe is perhaps the fastest player on the team and his participation on kick returns is pretty exciting.
2). Offense:
McCoy was McCoy. He threw a terrible INT but it’s early in the year. He’s going to be the best quarterback in the country. He still has some happy feet in the pocket and drifts out when it isn’t necessary to do so but overall, he was excellent and spread the ball to a big cast of receivers.
Speaking of the receivers, they look phenomenal. When Texas used the 4-wide receiver set with Dan Buckner in the TE-Flex spot they were picking up huge chunks of yards over the middle of the field. Jordan Shipley was used in that role last year and took some heavy punishment while torching OU and the rest of the Big 12. That Buckner can already occupy that role so well will mean great things for the offense. Kirkendoll looked over the middle as well.
The outside is very interesting. We didn’t see much of Malcolm Williams, which would be a great disappointment if not for the reason. The reason is John Chiles. He’s cut the the 15 pounds he needlessly added to play QB and he looks good in the open field. He’s a fantastic weapon for teams to account for, and teams just don’t have the resources in the back 7 to account for Chiles on the edge while defending the middle and the lethal Jordan Shipley.
Jordan might be the most underrated WR in the country. He’s really, really good. I don’t know what else to tell you. He does everything that WR’s are supposed to do well. He’s not huge and tall, that’s his only weakness.
The Texas running game pleased me greatly yesterday, except the fumbles. Greg Davis wisely chose not to scrap our zone-running game as I predicted in this space earlier. Instead, he did exactly what I proposed and expected and employed the inside and outside zones from a no-huddle offense with Vondrell McGee and successfully moved the ball down the field. He made 2 other tweaks that also generated some real results.
They moved Colt under center in the traditional 11 personnel (1 TE, 1 RB) formation we usually run from the shotgun and employed the zone-runs and play-action. We’ll see more of this later in the year. It’ll be a nice way to punish the over-aggressive Sooners.
Finally, they played DJ Monroe at RB and ran the old counter we really haven’t seen since Jamaal Charles left. I suppose they feel that you need great speed to the outside to run if effectively. At any rate, Monroe was a monster on the outside zone and counter and should see a lot of action in that role.
Between the 4 and 5 wide offense, the no-huddle under-center offense, DJ Monroe and the unstoppable jumbo package Texas has too many strengths on offense for any team to be able to handle.
On defense we showed a few interesting traits. We gave up some big plays, but the fact is that Texas will do that all year. Muschamp is going to play aggressively against what teams are running and leave Corners in single coverage and attack upfield. Now, there will be better execution down the road and you’ll see this defense play better and tighter but still give up some big plays in the running game or passing game as the competition intensifies.
The secondary looked pretty solid, barring the one play where Chykie blew coverage one on one and gave up a 75 yard TD pass. Ben Wells made a huge hit late in the game, hopefully this will give him confidence along with Christian Scott’s possible absence this season due to academic issues.
The Linebackers looked like an elite unit such as Texas hasn’t had since I started watching them. Roddrick Muckelroy picked up where he left off. Norton (hopefully not seriously injured) was good and a great inside back in our new 3-3-5 look. E. Acho and Keenan Robinson are fast strikers who can play in space or inside as necessary. I like them all a great deal.
Defensive End seems to have been the underrated strength of the team. Sam Acho might be better than I even dared to hope. Texas played the option last night about as poorly as they did when A&M used it to pull that disgusting upset in 2006 with the exception of Acho. When they ran it at Sergio he ran straight at the quarterback hoping to deliver a killing shot and set them up for the pitch that yielded some good runs. Acho played contain on the pitch man, forced the quarterback to keep it and created a fumble. He plays smart but is very athletic and gets in the backfield. Kindle, while a little over-aggressive on the option, is going to be phenomenal this season. He’s relentless in his pressure and athletic enough to punish teams on every play because of his pursuit. He might end Sam Bradford’s life this season. Alex Okafor also looked very good, and more importantly, he looked great against the run. Coming into the season he was supposed to be another pass-rushing weapon to rotate in against the hapless Big 12 quarterbacks we face but he demonstrated the know-how to use his penetration and athleticism to blow up the LA Monroe running game.
Houston played well but it was hard to evaluate DT play from the upper deck where I sat. Texas used the 4-2-5 under front they used for much of last season and also mixed in a lot of 3-3-5. I intended to write about the 3-3-5 before the season started but didn’t fully grasp what we’re doing with it.
Last season the front looked like this:
This year as follows:
Last season, Muschamp used the first front to create one-on-one matchups that paid big dividends for the pass-rush. The ends line up against the guards (who aren’t typically selected for their ability to defend the quarterback from quick rushers) and avoid double teams. Kindle could rush from the same side as Orakpo and prevent the Left tackle from coming to double Orakpo. If a team asked a guard to help double team Roy Miller they then had to also ask a tackle to slide inside 2 or 3 yards in time to block Orakpo or Houston, which is a little more useful than asking me to suit up and block Orakpo or Houston.
This season the ends are in the more traditional 5-tech, meaning they are lined up over the tackles instead of the guards. I’m not clear on the reasoning for this change but evidently Muschamp is not as interested in creating matchups for Kheeston Randall or Ben Alexander as he was with Roy Miller and I sympathize. Instead the linebackers we’ll have to take on guards inside more often and the ends have more responsibility, perfectly acceptable terms since these are team strengths. We’ll see how this front develops over the course of the season and what advantages it lends to Muschamp’s squad. Overall, I feel great about the defense, despite the 20 points allowed. They are fast and aggressive and will certainly create some turnovers. It also warrants mentioning that despite allowing 20 points, the defense only gave up 298 yards for the game yesterday.
So far so good, bring on Wyoming…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)