Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Avoiding being Blindsided in the NFL

The average NFL starting quarterback makes 5 million per year. Consequently, the average backup makes 1.6 million per year. In his book “Blindside” Michael Lewis highlighted that the starting Left Tackle, who holds down the job of keeping the quarterback upright and healthy, is now the 2nd highest paid position player in the NFL.
The meaning of all this, is that the NFL has become focused primarily on the quarterback. Finding the next Tom Brady or Peyton Manning and building your offense around him consumes the league. However, despite increased spending on left tackles in an attempt to protect the most valuable assets, quarterbacks still get injured and ruin seasons. Brady went down last year in game one and dealt a death blow to the Patriots superbowl hopes. Carson Palmer was on the rise as one of the league’s best signal callers and took a similar knee shot that has slowed him down and cost a season and those playoffs. Teams are becoming particularly adept at finding guys like Julius Peppers or James Harrison and unleashing them on the league’s franchise players.
Meanwhile, Jake Delhomme just signed a contract this offseason worth 42.5 million over 5 years, including 20 million guaranteed. The new contract helped free cap room for the panthers in 09, but still amounted to an average of 8.5 million per year invested in a player whose last outing was one of the most putrid playoff performances I’ve seen in my life in any sport.
The fact is, finding an elite drop-back talent at quarterback, nurturing it to its potential, and then protecting that asset is overly difficult and a different approach should be taken by those squads that haven’t already invested their franchise hopes into such massive contracts.
Another approach can be found in the “gimmicky” new trend in NFL running games, the Wildcat formation.
Keep reading, I’m not suggesting that NFL teams shelve their playbooks in favor of an all-Wildcat offense. However, the reason for the success of the Wildcat and the principles behind it can hold the answer for teams that want to build offenses without first finding a diamond in the rough or using the 1st pick on the draft on a dice roll.
The reason the Wildcat is so successful is because it creates a numerical advantage for the offense. After Peyton Manning hands the ball off, even on the stretch zone play where he runs parallel to the line to deliver the ball to the running back, he is no longer a part of the play. It becomes a game of 10 on 11.
The zone-read play, used by Texas with Vince Young and countless other college and high school programs, utilizes the principles of the old Veer-option game, picks a player on defense and makes him wrong every time.
In this particular play, the offensive line fires out and blocks in one direction while leaving the backside defensive end unblocked. The quarterback reads the end while putting the ball in the stomach of the running back (running away from the end). If the end pursues the running back, the quarterback keeps the ball and runs around the end against the grain of the play. If the end stays at home, the quarterback hands off the ball and the play is a typical running play.
The wildcat is built off the same principles of the zone read, and ultimately the veer-option. In fact, the Steelers used the zone-read last year and were credited for also having “implemented the wildcat” into their offense.
Misunderstandings by ESPN aside, these plays and formations in which the quarterback is as likely a running threat as the running back, should be the building block for an NFL offense.
The reason that NFL teams don’t use these plays, or use the wildcat which utilizes a 2nd running back to take the snap instead of the quarterback, brings us back to the beginning of this post. A team which has invested 5 million in a starter, 1.5 million into a backup, and perhaps 3 million into a left tackle, will not be interested in running an offense in which their quarterback might take 8-15 hits per game running the ball.
I propose that these numbers can be dramatically altered by investing the team’s resources differently and ultimately changing the quarterback position into something new.
The Steelers 2 years ago signed Dennis Dixon, after selecting him in the 2nd round, for 425,000 dollars. The Dolphins, a bit ahead of the curve in this realm thanks to Bill Parcells, drafted Pat White in the 2nd round of the 2009 draft. College football has embraced the spread offense and the spread to run offense and will be cranking out these players every year. Juice Williams of Illinois comes to mind, and to a lesser extent, Tim Tebow for next year’s draft. What’s more, they can be had in later draft rounds for less money.
So, here’s what implementation of this offense might look like:
1). Hire an offensive coordinator with an understanding of the modern veer-option offenses. This should be easy, just get an Urban Meyer or Rich Rodriquez disciple. Maybe get somebody interested in the no-huddle as well since they mix very well.

2). Sign or draft these college quarterback/athletes who other teams don’t have obvious uses for. Instead of converting Matt Jones to receiver, try him out in the option offense (or maybe someone without a history with crack but you get the idea). These players, who don’t have obvious value in the NFL can be had at discount or with cheaper draft picks. Additionally, guys in college with little or no NFL projection now have value for your team. Players who thrive in these offenses in college like Percy Harvin or Jeremy Maclin are now NFL sure things instead of guys who will have to adjust to new offenses and roles. Anyone who has athleticism has more upside.
Now, in addition to taking these players who are used to running option offenses for colleges, you have a monopoly on certain talent and can derive greater value from others. You will miss out on the Matthew Staffords though…so you may be missing out on the next Ryan Leaf. If you can handle that kind of pressure…

3). Sign multiple quarterbacks. Teams are afraid of these running plays because of injury to the quarterback. But if you make the quarterback like every other position and have 2 or 3 Dennis Dixons on your squad you have turned the quarterback into a position like running back. You can run it by committee and not worry that a broken ankle or busted knee will ruin your season and all your playoff hopes. You could even have one higher end running quarterback (like Vince Young) with a larger salary and still find a player who can back him up and run the spread-option offense at value.

4). Build up the rest of your team with the freed up financial assets you have procured from not paying 1/6 of your cap to one player. Having an elite left tackle is still not a bad idea, but you may just want to settle for a really good left tackle and also a great Center, Guard, Right tackle etc. Ultimately an offense’s ceiling is set by the offensive line. No matter how great your split end receiver is, if you don’t have enough time to throw he’s wasted. Any solid running back can look great behind a great run-blocking line (see Denver Broncos in Mike Shanahan era). Both Mannings and Brady all benefit from having great offensive lines. If you have, say, Pat White and Juice Williams at quarterback behind an awesome offensive line you’re in business.
Additionally great teams are built through investment in the trenches. 2 great to elite Defensive tackles can make an entire defense. Investing in your lines at the expense of spending money at the skill positions is much more feasible if you are drafting your skill players in later rounds with an eye towards option weapons including at quarterback and avoiding signing enormous contracts to skill players (a new rookie cap might help as well, we’ll see if that happens).

5). The passing game still needs to exist, obviously. However, the simple passing games mastered by these players at the college level can work in the NFL level with great complexity and versatility. If teams have to load up 8 defenders in the box to stop your running game it doesn’t take Peyton Manning to punish them in the passing game and it doesn’t take a playbook with multiple volumes. NFL teams have almost infinitely more time to practice than college teams and can afford to spend time developing athletic college stars into competent enough passers.

Now, there are many people who will think that because the NFL doesn’t run offenses like this it won’t work. These are probably the same people who told us that Urban Meyer’s spread offense couldn’t handle “SEC speed!!!”. Piercing analysis which also tells us how the Dolphins went to the playoffs last year after going 1-15 in 2007 utilizing the Wildcat formation. Here are some of the likely objections to implementing this offense:

1). The option doesn’t work in the NFL because a). the defenders are faster b). the quarterbacks get injured c). the coaches figure it out
These are all similar in presuming that NFL defenders will punish teams that run the option by swallowing up plays after working out the “gimmick” and injuring your stars. Well, we’ve partially addressed this by simply having more quarterbacks and running backs (everyone already does this) on the roster to handle injuries. The notion that the option plays won’t work in the NFL is absurd. We’ve seen them work. If you think that teams struggle defending the option because it’s a gimmick that just needs to be worked out you aren’t paying attention to what other teams are doing. Most NFL teams have playbooks built around 4 main types of running plays. It isn’t the great complexity of running plays that makes teams great, it’s personnel and execution. If you have one NFL team with an option game seasoned with practice and great personnel you will have success in the running game against NFL teams. It is my contention, again, that the option running plays are better than the 4 main plays used in the NFL due to the numerical advantage of having 11 on 11 every play.

2). If this would work teams would do it.
Every year we see teams hire the same fired coaches over and over again. We see washed up quarterbacks get re-signed and old guys get another chance. The idea that teams would automatically do something that would work assumes a level of perfection achieved in the NFL that ignore previous innovation and is rather naïve. Additionally, we see teams, like the Dolphins, starting to employ these principles and finding success. Teams are afraid to be the first to try something and face ruin if it doesn’t work out. Bill Parcells doesn’t give a crap and has been ahead of the curve before in building teams (like finding Lawrence Taylor and spawning the creation of all the Julius Peppers, Shawn Merrimans, and Brian Orakpos we see today). I don’t know if we’ll see a team go as far as I’ve described but we will see more of the wildcat and some of the 11 on 11 principles are sure to finally catch hold in the NFL (whereas they’ve been staples in the high school and college game for decades).

3). You need a leader at quarterback and not another interchangeable skill position player:
I kind of made this one up myself and but it seems a likely objection and also the best one I can think of because most teams are led by their quarterback. In addition to relying on him as the focal point of the offense, he must run the offense and lead the team. If you are counting on a couple of guys to do this, or are running a greater risk of the no. 1 guy getting hurt, you will still damage the team’s chemistry.
I object somewhat to the idea that running quarterbacks will get hurt particularly more. I think that a quarterback motionless in the pocket getting sacked over and over will be injured more often than a running quarterback (see Donovan MacNabb). Certainly I must concede that they will probably wear down like running backs do and the committee approach is necessary. Due to greater practice time for NFL teams it is possible to have multiple quarterbacks (as it is running backs) who can master the system and run the team effectively. As far as overall leadership goes, I would rather roll my dice that players on the team can handle themselves professionally and that leaders would emerge then count on one guy to lead the team in every facet of the game and cross my fingers every year that he doesn’t get hurt.

3 comments:

  1. It should be noted (I had misremembered) that it was the Ravens who ran the zone-read, with Troy Smith, and were falsely attributed with having adapted the wildcat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent read. Troy Smith could be a real good Wildcat guy. He's really built and could take the pounding. Too bad the Ravens believe a 6-6 200+ pounder is their future. Then again I could be wrong, his name is Flacco after all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So you're saying that the 13.9 million dollars that the 4-win Bengals are spending on Carson Palmer could be better distributed to other players?! I'm skeptical.

    I was right. This is going to be one of my favorite reads on the web.

    ReplyDelete